Authors submitting their manuscript to JAEP Health Sciences are required to follow the formatting and content guidelines below:

Manuscript format                              

The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; text must be justified, and double spaced, Times New Roman font, employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.

A. Original research.

1. Title and Author Details

• The title of the paper must not exceed 20 words and should be written in 18-point font size.

• Author names should be separated by commas and followed by superscript numbers corresponding to their affiliations.

• Affiliations must include: Department, Institution/University, City, and Country (e.g., Department of Public Health, Johannesburg University, Johannesburg, South Africa).

• Email: Corresponding author email: example: John Mahna, Mahna@gamil.com

2. Abstract

• The abstract must be structured into the following headings: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion.

• Maximum word count: 300 words.

• Do not exceed 6 keywords.

3. Manuscript Word Count

• The full manuscript total word count range is between 3000 and 5000 words, excluding references, tables, and figures.

4. Introduction

• Provide context and literature background.

• The final paragraph should clearly state the study objective.

5. Materials and Methods

Include the following subsections:

• Study Design

• Study Population and Sampling

• Dependent and Independent Variables

• Study Instruments

• Validity and Reliability of the Instrument

  • Validity

  • Reliability

• Statistical Analysis

• Ethical Considerations

6. Results

• Report findings based on statistical analysis.

• Integrate tables and figures within the results section at appropriate points.

• Each table or figure must have a legend placed below it.

7. Conclusion

• Summarize key findings based on the results.

• Avoid introducing new data in this section.

8. Abbreviations

• Use minimal abbreviations. Define all non-standard abbreviations the first time they appear in the text.

9. Acknowledgements

• Acknowledge participants, institutions, or individuals who supported the study.

10. Author Contributions

• Specify contributions using author initials (e.g., J.K. – conceptualization; M.T. – data analysis; R.N. – manuscript writing; etc.).

11. Authors’ Affiliations

• Must correspond to those mentioned earlier in the manuscript:

  • Format: Department, Organization, City, Country

12. Funding

• Clearly state the funding source and reference number if available.

• If no funding was received, include the statement: “This study did not receive any external funding.”

13. Data Availability Statement

• If the dataset has been submitted, provide the online access link. The dataset should be saved on the free online dataset and provide the link during submission.

• If not submitted, justify the reason (e.g., ethical restrictions, proprietary data).

14. References

• Ensure references are authentic and correspond accurately to in-text citations.

• Accepted referencing styles:

  • APA Style

  • Vancouver Style

• All in-text citations must be correctly formatted and consistent with the reference list.

Example of referencing

1. Vancouver Style

🔹 In-text citation

Use numbers in blanket

• Example:
  “Malnutrition in hospitalized children is often underdiagnosed [1].”
  OR
  “Malnutrition in hospitalized children is often underdiagnosed [1,2].”

• OR
  “Malnutrition in hospitalized children is often underdiagnosed [1-3].”

🔹 Reference list entry

Listed numerically in the order cited:

Example Reference (Journal Article):

1.    Smith J, Taylor R, Khan A. The impact of disease-related malnutrition in pediatric wards. J Clin Nutr. 2020;45(3):123-9.

2. APA Style (7th edition)

🔹 In-text citation

Use author's surname and year in parentheses:

• Example:
  “Malnutrition in hospitalized children is often underdiagnosed (Smith, Taylor, & Khan, 2020).”

• One author: (Smith, 2020)

• For two authors: (Smith & Taylor, 2020)

• For three or more authors: (Smith et al., 2020)

🔹 Reference list entry

List entries alphabetically by author’s surname:

Example Reference (Journal Article):
Smith, J., Taylor, R., & Khan, A. (2020). The impact of disease-related malnutrition in pediatric wards. Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 45(3), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jcn.2020.12345

B. Point of View: Perspective or Commentary Articles

Perspective articles present personal viewpoints or critical reflections on health-related topics in a narrative, engaging style. Topics may cover personal experiences, historical insights, or critiques of scientific methodology. The word count range is 1000-1,500, and each submission may include one figure, one table, and up to 10 references. These articles are generally organized into four sections: Abstract, Introduction, Main Discussion (with headings), and a conclusion.

C. Systematic Review and metanalysis Articles

A systematic review article presents a scholarly and balanced evaluation of current developments or the present understanding of a timely subject. Abstract, Introduction, Methods (including PRISMA), Results, Discussion, Conclusion. Ensure the registry of the study before starting with a precision on the methodology process. Unlike original research, it does not include new data or personal clinical experiences. Instead, it synthesizes findings from existing literature to provide insights into advancements in a specific field. These articles begin with a concise abstract of up to 300 words and  with a total word count between 4000 to 6,000. Each section should thoroughly explain relevant disease processes, supported by appropriate images and a sound conclusion. Authors are allowed to include up to 100 references, 30 figures (including subparts), and four tables.

D. Case Series

This section is designated for reporting two or more related clinical cases that share similar outcomes or characteristics. A case series should not exceed 1,500 words and must include an unstructured abstract (up to 150 words), followed by an introduction, a description of the cases, and a discussion section. Authors can include up to 10 references and a maximum of 3 figures or tables. Additionally, up to 5 keywords must accompany the abstract.

E. Case Reports

Case reports should highlight unique, novel, and clinically meaningful cases that offer diagnostic insights or therapeutic challenges with educational value for practitioners. The report must be structured with an unstructured abstract (maximum 150 words), followed by sections such as Introduction, Case Description, Discussion, and Conclusion. The entire report word counts should be (1,500 – 2,500 words) and may include up to 15 references, 4 figures, and 2 tables. A maximum of four authors is permitted.

F. Letters to the Editor

These brief submissions are intended to offer constructive feedback on articles recently published in JAEP Health sciences, typically within the past two months. Letters should reference only the data presented in the original article and must not repeat previously published content or be under review elsewhere. Each letter, typically authored by experts in the field, should include a concise title and be limited to 200 words. The overall word count must not exceed 400. Submissions can include up to 4 references and 2 figures (or 4 image subparts) but no tables. The maximum number of authors is two. Letters and replies are not subject to peer review but may be edited for content and style.

G. Short Communications

Short Communications provide concise reports of completed studies that are narrower in scope or describe novel methods or specific cases. These articles should contain between 1,500 and 2,000 words, including an abstract of up to 200 words. The main body can merge the introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion into a unified section. A maximum of 2 figures, 2 tables, and 15 references is allowed.

H. Lessons from the Field

These contributions detail real-world approaches and operational strategies applied to public health issues, incorporating contextual factors like leadership dynamics, resource constraints, and cultural influences. Articles in this category aim to share practical insights gained from experience. Submissions typically outline the problem, background setting, evidence-informed interventions, stakeholder engagement, and key lessons learned. The structure includes an abstract (up to 300 words) and a total word count between 1000-2,000. Don’t exceed two figures and two tables.

Reviewer Guidelines for JAEP Health Sciences

These guidelines are intended to assist reviewers in providing rigorous, constructive, and fair evaluations of manuscripts submitted to JAEP Health Sciences. The journal promotes high-quality research in public health, epidemiology, health sciences, and related disciplines. Reviewers should assess manuscripts based on scientific quality, methodological rigor, clarity, and contribution to the advancement of knowledge.

1. General Principles for Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to:

• Provide objective, confidential, and unbiased assessments of submitted manuscripts.

• Evaluate whether the study meets scientific and ethical standards.

• Offer constructive feedback to improve the manuscript.

• Identify methodological weaknesses, ethical concerns, or reporting gaps.

• Assess whether the manuscript contributes new knowledge to the scientific community.

Reviewers should follow international standards such as those recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the Committee on Publication Ethics.

2. Evaluation of Paper Format and Structure

Title and Author Details

• The title of the paper must not exceed 20 words and should be written in 16-point font size.

• Author names should be separated by commas and followed by superscript numbers corresponding to their affiliations.

• Affiliations must include: Department, Institution/University, City, and Country (e.g., Department of Public Health, Johannesburg University, Johannesburg, South Africa).

• Email: Corresponding author email: example: John Mahna, Mahna@gamil.com

Reviewers should confirm that the manuscript follows a standard scientific structure, typically including:

1. Title

2. Abstract

3. Keywords

4. Introduction

5. Methodology

6. Data Analysis / Results

7. Discussion

8. Conclusion

9. Ethical Considerations

10. Authors’ Contributions

11. References

The manuscript should demonstrate logical organization, clarity, and scientific coherence.

3. Abstract Requirements

The abstract should:

• Not exceed 300 words.

• Clearly summarize the background, objectives, methodology, key results, and conclusions.

• Reflect the main findings of the study accurately.

• Avoid citations, abbreviations, or unnecessary technical details.

Reviewers should assess whether the abstract accurately represents the content of the manuscript.

4. Methodology Assessment

The methodology section should be evaluated for:

• Clarity of study design (e.g., cross-sectional, cohort, clinical trial).

• Adequate description of study population, sampling methods, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.

• Clear description of data collection procedures and tools.

• Appropriateness of the research design to answer the study objectives or research questions.

• Transparency in describing interventions, measurements, and variables.

Reviewers should ensure that the methods are replicable and scientifically sound.

5. Data Analysis and Statistical Reporting

Reviewers should assess whether:

• The statistical methods are appropriate for the study design and data type.

• Authors respect statistical assumptions when conducting analyses (e.g., normality, independence, homogeneity of variance where applicable).

• Analytical methods are clearly described and justified.

• Results are reported with appropriate statistical indicators (e.g., confidence intervals, p-values, effect sizes).

• Tables and figures clearly present the results without duplication.

Interpretation of results should be accurate and consistent with the statistical findings.

6. Discussion Section

Reviewers should evaluate whether the discussion:

• Interprets the results in relation to the study objectives.

• Compares findings with existing scientific literature.

• Identifies the strengths and limitations of the study.

• Avoids overinterpretation or unsupported claims.

• Provides implications for policy, practice, or future research.

7. Contribution to the Current Body of Knowledge

A key role of reviewers is to assess whether the manuscript adds value to existing scientific knowledge.

Reviewers should consider:

• Whether the study provides new evidence, insights, or perspectives.

• Its relevance to public health, epidemiology, or health sciences.

• Its potential impact on research, policy, clinical practice, or community health.

• Whether the study fills an identified research gap.

8. Ethical Clearance

Reviewers should confirm that the manuscript includes:

• Approval from a recognized ethics review committee or institutional review board (IRB) where applicable.

• A statement confirming informed consent from participants when human subjects are involved.

• Compliance with international ethical standards such as those outlined by the World Health Organization.

If ethical approval is missing or unclear, reviewers should request clarification.

9. Authors’ Contributions

The manuscript should clearly specify the individual contributions of each author, including roles such as:

• Study conception and design

• Data collection

• Data analysis

• Manuscript drafting

• Critical review and editing

This ensures transparency and accountability in authorship.

10. References and Citation Style

Reviewers should ensure that:

• References are relevant, recent, and appropriate.

• Citations follow either APA style or Vancouver style consistently throughout the manuscript.

• Sources are credible and accurately cited.

• Excessive self-citation or irrelevant references are avoided.

11. Final Recommendation

At the end of the review, reviewers should provide a recommendation:

• Accept without revision

• Minor revision

• Major revision

• Reject

Reviewers should clearly justify their recommendation with specific and constructive comments.

✔ Note to Reviewers
The editorial board of JAEP Health Sciences values the critical role of peer reviewers in maintaining the scientific quality, integrity, and credibility of the journal. Reviewers are encouraged to provide feedback that supports both scientific rigor and the development of authors’ work.

Open Access Policy

All articles published in the Journal of African Epidemiology and Public Health (JAEP Health Sciences) are immediately and permanently available online at no cost to readers. JAEP Health Sciences is committed to the principles of open access publishing, there are no subscription or registration barriers.

Authors retain copyright of their work and grant JAEP Health Sciences the non-exclusive right to publish the article. By submitting to JAEP Health Sciences, authors also grant third parties the perpetual right to use, reproduce, and distribute the article under the terms of the applicable Creative Commons license.

For authors who are unable to hold copyright, JAEP Health Sciences accommodates alternative copyright lines. Authors in this category should contact the editorial office in advance.

Data Availability Policy

JAEP Health Sciences supports open science and transparent research. Authors are expected to make all data underlying their findings publicly accessible unless legal or ethical restrictions apply.

1. Public Data Repositories

When relevant, datasets should be deposited in publicly available, community-endorsed repositories. A list of recognized repositories is provided in our (Data Sharing Guidelines).

If no suitable repository exists, data should be included as supplementary materials or provided in the main article.

2. Data Availability Statement

All submissions must include an “Availability of Data and Materials” statement that clearly describes:

• Where the data can be accessed (with links or DOIs),

• Any restrictions on availability and the reasons for those restrictions.

3. Legal and Ethical Considerations

If data sharing is limited due to privacy, ethical, or legal issues, authors must provide a clear justification in the data availability section.

Data and Software Citation

JAEP Health Sciences endorsing the FORCE11 Data Citation Principles means that the journal supports and promotes the proper citation of data used in research, just like traditional scholarly references. The FORCE11 (Future of Research Communications and e-Scholarship) initiative developed these principles to improve the recognition, accessibility, and reproducibility of research data.

By endorsing these principles, JAEP Health Sciences commits to:

• Encouraging authors to cite datasets clearly and consistently.

• Promoting data transparency and reusability in research.

• Supporting practices that give proper credit to data creators.

• Ensuring that cited data is accessible and persistent through reliable repositories.

In essence, this endorsement reflects the journal's dedication to responsible research practices and the advancement of open science.

Datasets used in the research, especially those that are publicly available must be formally cited in the reference list.

Each citation should include:

• Author(s) of the dataset (if applicable),

• Dataset title,

• Repository name,

• DOI or unique identifier,

• Year of availability.

Examples:

·        Kalimba SM et al. Whole genome sequences of invasive Salmonella enterica isolates from Kenya. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12345678.v1 (2020).

·        EBI ENA. https://identifiers.org/ena.embl:PRJEB31353 (2019).

Availability of Research Materials

Authors are expected to make biological materials, reagents, and other research tools described in the manuscript available for non-commercial use. Reasonable costs for distribution may be requested. Any restrictions on availability must be clearly stated.

The corresponding author is primarily responsible for ensuring materials availability.

Study Pre-registration

JAEP Health Sciences encourages the pre-registration of study protocols and statistical analysis plans in public registries. Pre-registration details should be included in the manuscript.

Replication Studies

JAEP Health Sciences welcomes well-designed replication studies that provide insight into previously published work. These submissions will be assessed with the same editorial rigor as original research.

Reporting Standards

To promote transparency and reproducibility, JAEP Health Sciences adheres to internationally recognized reporting standards. Authors should consult our submission guidelines for details.

Support for Data Sharing

JAEP Health Sciences is committed to guide authors in responsible data sharing and encourages the use of the following resources:

• Our Data Help Desk (for advice on data management),

• Recommended data repositories,

• Companion journals for publishing datasets (where appropriate).

Indexing and Archiving

JAEP Health Sciences is actively working toward inclusion in major indexing and abstracting services to increase visibility and citation of published work. Once indexed, articles will be searchable through platforms such as:

• DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)

• Google Scholar

• PubMed Central (pending)

• Scopus and Web of Science (application in progress)

• EBSCO, ProQuest, and other global databases

All articles are archived in trusted digital repositories to ensure long-term preservation and accessibility. Full-text versions will also be available through our publishing platform.

Peer-Review Policy

JAEP Health Sciences is committed to maintaining high standards of scientific integrity and quality. To ensure the credibility of published work, all manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer-review process prior to acceptance.

Review Process

Submitted manuscripts are evaluated by independent experts in the relevant field, who assess:

• Originality of the work,

• Scientific validity of the research,

• Relevance and contribution to the fields of epidemiology and public health.

The journal aims to obtain at least two peer review reports for each manuscript presenting original or secondary research. In rare or specialized areas where it is difficult to secure multiple reviewers, editorial decisions may be based on a single high-quality review, in accordance with ethical guidelines.

Reviewer Selection and Transparency

JAEP Health Sciences may engage recognized external partners to help identify qualified reviewers, especially when delays occur. In such cases, reviewers may receive a modest honorarium for timely, objective evaluations.

JAEP Health Sciences supports transparent peer review: if a manuscript is published, anonymized reviewer comments may be made publicly available alongside the article to promote openness and serve as an educational resource. Reviewers may choose whether or not to sign their reviews.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are made solely based on scientific merit, not on potential impact or novelty. Manuscripts must present a sound research question, appropriate methodology, and analysis consistent with accepted standards in the field.

The Editor-in-Chief has ultimate responsibility for all editorial decisions, while members of the Editorial Board may act as handling editors. If a board member has a conflict of interest with a submission, another editor will be assigned to manage the review process.

Article Collections

JAEP Health Sciences periodically publishes themed article collections that focus on specific topics or emerging issues in the fields of epidemiology, public health, and clinical sciences. These collections aim to bring together high-quality research that contributes to scientific knowledge and informs policy and practice. Researchers are encouraged to submit to active collections relevant to their area of expertise. Calls for papers and submission guidelines for upcoming collections are regularly updated on the journal’s website.

Submissions to special issues or thematic collections

Submissions to special issues or thematic collections are subject to the same peer-review standards as regular articles. All editorial and ethical policies, including those on competing interests, apply.

Editorial and Ethical Policies

Authors must adhere to JAEP Health Sciences’ editorial guidelines, including those related to:

• Authorship and contributions,

• Ethical approvals,

• Data sharing,

• Conflicts of interest.

JAEP Health Sciences and its publisher maintain neutrality in jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations presented in submitted work.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors who wish to appeal a decision or raise concerns about the editorial or review process may submit a formal request. Appeals will be reviewed impartially by an independent editor not involved in the original decision.

Citation Format

Articles published in JAEP Health Sciences are assigned unique article identifiers rather than page numbers. A typical citation should follow this format:

Author(s). Title of the article. JAEP Health Sciences: Journal of African Epidemiology and Public Health. Year; Volume: Article number.

Example:

Lethabo E, Melokuhle J. Socioeconomic determinants of malaria prevalence in Northern Rwanda. JAEP Health Sciences. 2025; 1:102.

Why Publish with JAEP Health Sciences?

High Visibility

As an open access journal, all articles published in JAEP Health Sciences are freely accessible worldwide, enhancing readership and citation.

Timely Publication

JAEP Health Sciences ensures a fast, fully electronic submission and peer-review process. Final articles are published promptly online upon acceptance.

Multimedia Flexibility

Authors can include large datasets, interactive graphics, and media files to support their findings and enhance reader engagement.

Global Promotion

Selected articles may be featured in press releases, newsletters, and online highlights, expanding reach beyond the academic community.

Author Rights

Authors retain full copyright of their work published in JAEP Health Sciences, under the terms of a Creative Commons license, allowing for broad dissemination and reuse.

When an author submits a manuscript for publication, they are required to sign a licensing agreement with JAEP Health Sciences, granting permission to publish their work. Under this agreement:

• Authors retain full copyright of their articles published in JAEP Health Sciences.

• Authors provide JAEP Health Sciences with publishing rights and acknowledge JAEP Health Sciences as the original publisher.

• Authors maintain extensive rights to reuse their content in future publications.

• Upon publication, JAEP Health Sciences applies a Creative Commons license that permits certain third-party reuse.

JAEP Health Sciences publishes articles as open access under either a CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International) or CC BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license:

• CC BY-NC-ND: Allows sharing for non-commercial use with author credit; commercial use or modification requires permission.

• CC BY: Allows reuse and adaptation for any purpose, including commercial, provided authors are properly credited.

Authors may also explore license options that comply with specific funder or institutional open access (OA) policies. Learn more in our guide to licensing copyright and author rights for journal articles.

This Copyright Agreement is a sample document provided for demonstration purposes only. Please replace it with your journal’s official terms.

• Grant of Rights

By submitting a manuscript, the author grants the Journal a non‑exclusive, worldwide license to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the accepted work in print and digital formats.

• Author Responsibilities

The author confirms that:

- The work is original and has not been published elsewhere.

- All co‑authors have approved the submission.

Any third‑party material is properly credited and used with permission.

• Open Access and Reuse

Unless otherwise stated, the journal may distribute the work under its standard open‑access policy. Authors retain moral rights to be identified as the creators of the work.

• Corrections and Retractions

The journal reserves the right to issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions in accordance with ethical publishing standards.

• Contact

Questions regarding this agreement should be sent to editor@jaephs.org.

We offer professional language editing and translation services to support researchers aiming to publish in high-quality journals.

Our services include:

• Thorough grammar and style editing to ensure clarity, accuracy, and academic tone

• Expert language translation (English ↔ French) to maintain consistency and meaning across both versions

Whether you're preparing a manuscript, thesis, or report, our team ensures your work meets international publishing standards.

To request expert assistance, please contact editor@jaephs.org.

We offer scientific editing and proofreading services for all types of health-related research, including:

• Theses

• Dissertations

• Journal articles

• Technical reports

Our services are designed to improve the clarity, accuracy, and overall quality of your scientific writing, ensuring your work is well-structured, error-free, and aligned with academic and journal standards.

Whether you are working on public health, clinical research, or health systems studies, we help refine your content to effectively communicate your findings and support health improvement.

For expert support, send your request to editor@jaephs.org.

Manuscript writing is a hectic work, especially for academicians juggling multiple responsibilities such as teaching, research, supervision, and administrative duties. The process of drafting, organizing, editing, and formatting a scholarly manuscript can be time-consuming and overwhelming, often delaying publication goals.

For many researchers, the challenge lies not only in generating scientific content but also in presenting it clearly, concisely, and in line with journal standards.

To support researchers and academicians, professional manuscript editing services are available to help polish your work and improve its chances of acceptance. These services include:

• In-depth language editing

• Restructuring for clarity and flow

• Proper referencing

• Proofreading

• Ensuring compliance with specific journal requirements

The goal is to enhance your manuscript’s readability, accuracy, and overall presentation while preserving your academic voice and intent.

If you are an academician seeking assistance with manuscript preparation, you are encouraged to send your request to editor@jaephs.org. Whether you need help refining a research article, thesis, or grant proposal, expert support is available to guide you toward producing a high-quality, publication-ready manuscript.

JAEP Health Sciences is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.

JAEP Health Sciences is an academic journal dedicated to advancing research in African epidemiology, public health, and health sciences. The journal aims to strengthen scientific knowledge and support improvements in healthcare systems and public health development across Africa.

JAEP Health Sciences serves as a platform for researchers, health professionals, policymakers, and academics to share high-quality scientific evidence and innovative ideas that address pressing health challenges on the African continent. The journal is committed to maintaining high academic standards through a rigorous editorial screening and peer-review process, ensuring that published research contributes meaningfully to the advancement of science and health practice.

The journal particularly encourages research that addresses African health priorities, including disease prevention, health system strengthening, epidemiological surveillance, community health promotion, and emerging public health threats.

JAEP Health Sciences is a publication initiative of the African Institute of Research for Public Health and Development (AIRPD) (www.airpd.org). AIRPD is an institution committed to promoting research, knowledge dissemination, and capacity building in public health and development across Africa.

Vision

To contribute to the improvement of health and well-being in Africa through the generation and dissemination of high-quality scientific knowledge.

Mission

To support evidence-based public health and healthcare development in Africa by publishing rigorous research, fostering scientific collaboration, and promoting innovation in epidemiology and health sciences.

The Journal of African Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences (JAEP Health Sciences) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal dedicated to advancing knowledge and practice in epidemiology, public health and health sciences across Africa and beyond. The journal welcomes original research, reviews, commentaries, and other scholarly articles that address the distribution, determinants, and prevention of disease, as well as strategies to promote health at the population level.

JAEP Health Sciences places particular emphasis on studies that explore:

• The social, environmental, behavioral, and occupational determinants of health and disease

• The design, implementation, and evaluation of health policies and interventions

• Public health practices and outcomes across diverse African settings

• Research relevant to global health equity and human rights

JAEP Health Sciences encourages submissions in the following thematic areas:

• Epidemiology of chronic and infectious diseases

• Environmental and occupational health

• Biostatistics, research methods, and public health informatics

• Maternal, child, and adolescent health

• Nutritional health and non-communicable disease prevention

• Mental health and psychosocial well-being

• Injury and violence prevention

• Disaster preparedness and emergency public health response

• Education, training, and capacity-building in public health

• Digital health innovations and health communication strategies

• Health promotion, behavior change, and lifestyle interventions

• Public health economics, systems, policy, and governance

• Social determinants of health and health equity

• Health sciences with effect on community health and global issues.

• Innovation in public health

Submissions must demonstrate scientific rigor, ethical compliance, and relevance to the field. JAEP Health Sciences evaluates manuscripts based on methodological quality, clarity, and contribution to public health knowledge-not on perceived novelty or potential impact.

JAEP Health Sciences accepts manuscripts that are both clinical in nature and within the broader scope of epidemiology and public health.

Terms and Conditions

Welcome to the JAEP Health Sciences (“Platform”, “we”, “our”, or “us”). By accessing or using this platform, you agree to comply with and be bound by the following terms and conditions. Please read them carefully before using the platform.

1. Use of the Platform

• This platform is intended for academic, research, and educational purposes only.

• Users must not misuse the platform, including attempting to disrupt its functionality, gain unauthorized access, or violate applicable laws.

2. User Accounts

• You may be required to create an account to submit manuscripts or access certain features.

• You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your login credentials and for all activities that occur under your account.

3. Submission and Publication

• Submitted manuscripts must be original, properly cited, and must not be under consideration elsewhere.

• By submitting an article, you grant us a license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the content in any format or medium.

• We reserve the right to reject, edit, or remove any content that violates our editorial policies or ethical standards.

4. Intellectual Property

• All content published on the platform remains the intellectual property of the authors unless otherwise stated.

• You may not reproduce, redistribute, or commercially exploit any content without prior written permission.

5. Privacy and Data

• Your use of the platform is also governed by our Privacy Policy.

• We do not sell personal data. All data collected is used solely for platform functionality and publication processes.

6. Modifications

• We reserve the right to change or update these terms at any time. Continued use of the platform constitutes acceptance of the updated terms.

7. Limitation of Liability

• We are not liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use or inability to use the platform, or from unauthorized access to your data.

8. Governing Law

• These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of [Insert Jurisdiction], without regard to its conflict of law provisions.

JAEP Health Sciences is an Open Access journal. The Article Processing Charge (APC) is to support the costs associated with editorial processing, peer review management, copyediting, typesetting, online hosting, and long-term archiving. Authors from eligible institutions or low-income countries may qualify for discounts or full waivers. Payment is requested only after the manuscript has been accepted for publication. Therefore, APCs are calculated based on the date of article acceptance, not the submission date.

JAEP Health Sciences may implement a tiered pricing model based on the author’s country of residence, in line with regional economic classifications. This approach promotes equity and encourages participation from researchers in low- and middle-income countries. The following tables provides further details on the APC:

APC by Region

Region APC Range in (USD)

USA, Canada, Europe

$2,000

Australia, New Zealand, Middle East

$1,200

Asia, South America

$800

Africa

$150

Waivers and Discounts

JAEP Health Sciences is committed to promoting equitable access to scientific publishing. We consider requests for APC waivers or discounts on a case-by-case basis, particularly for:

• Authors from low-income or lower-middle-income countries,

• Researchers without institutional or grant funding.

Waiver or discount requests must be made at the time of manuscript submission. Requests submitted during peer review or after acceptance will not be considered.

Open Access Funding Support

Authors are encouraged to consult their institutions or funding bodies for support in covering APCs. Many research funders and universities maintain open access publishing agreements or funds to assist authors.

JAEP Health Sciences will provide guidance on available open access agreements and funders on our website.

We value your privacy and are committed to protecting the personal information you share with our journal platform. We collect only the data needed to provide our services, including account details, manuscript submissions, reviewer/editor communications, and basic usage analytics, and we use this information to manage submissions, support peer review, improve platform performance, maintain security, and communicate important updates. We do not sell your personal data, and we share information only with authorized staff, reviewers, editors, and trusted service providers when necessary to operate the platform or comply with legal obligations. We apply reasonable technical and organizational safeguards to protect your data, retain it only as long as needed for editorial, legal, and operational purposes, and respect your rights to access, correct, or request deletion of your personal information where applicable by contacting our support team.

Our platform uses cookies and similar technologies to ensure core functionality, keep users signed in securely, remember preferences, and improve overall performance. These cookies may include essential session cookies, security cookies, and limited analytics cookies that help us understand how pages are used so we can improve the submission and review experience. We do not use cookies to sell personal data, and any third-party tools we use are limited to service delivery, security, and performance measurement. You can control or disable cookies through your browser settings at any time, but some features of the platform may not work properly if essential cookies are blocked. By continuing to use the platform, you acknowledge the use of cookies as described in this policy.